Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Vandalism

Latest comment: 7 hours ago by The Squirrel Conspiracy in topic Ferezcopowersystem

Shortcuts: COM:ANV • COM:AVI • COM:AIV

This is a place where users can communicate with administrators, or administrators with one another. You can report vandalism, problematic users, or anything else that needs an administrator's intervention. Do not report child pornography or other potentially illegal content here; e-mail legal-reports@wikimedia.org instead. If reporting threatened harm to self or others also email emergency@wikimedia.org.

Vandalism
[new section]
User problems
[new section]
Blocks and protections
[new section]
Other
[new section]

Report users for clear cases of vandalism. Block requests for any other reason should be reported to the blocks and protections noticeboard.


Report disputes with users that require administrator assistance. Further steps are listed at resolve disputes.


Reports that do not suit the vandalism noticeboard may be reported here. Requests for page protection/unprotection could also be requested here.


Other reports that require administrator assistance which do not fit in any of the previous three noticeboards may be reported here. Requests for history merging or splitting should be filed at COM:HMS.

Archives
23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1
98, 97, 96, 95, 94, 93, 92, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 77, 76, 75, 74, 73, 72, 71, 70, 69, 68, 67, 66, 65, 64, 63, 62, 61, 60, 59, 58, 57, 56, 55, 54, 53, 52, 51, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 44, 43, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 36, 35, 34, 33, 32, 31, 30, 29, 28, 27, 26, 25, 24, 23, 22, 21, 20, 19, 18, 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1

To create a report please click on the button above and fill the fields. Alternatively you may copy the following template, replacing USER/IP and REASON with your content, and place it at the bottom of this page:

{{subst:Report vandal|USER/IP|REASON. ~~~~}}

Hasan ElAbdullaH

edit
  Done More warnings, all files deleted. Yann (talk) 16:17, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Martinez12937

edit

User: Martinez12937 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Uploading copyrighted publicity photos and magazine covers and selfies of Stephanie Cam as "own work" after a final warning, and reuploading some when they are deleted. No other contributions. Belbury (talk) 17:52, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done blocked for a month, because this is so clear-cut, but @Belbury, this really should have come to COM:AN/U, with a notification on their talk page. There is no indication that this was vandalism (intentional harm to the project), just someone focused on getting particular material out there and not caring about anything else. - Jmabel ! talk 18:03, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: I figured that clear-cut copyvios after being asked to stop was harming the project, but noted, I'll use ANU for future cases like this.
Do you intend to delete the own-work selfies and I-found-this-online Vogue covers and so on, or shall I open a DR? Belbury (talk) 18:12, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Belbury: Please open a DR, or if something is blatant enough (you mention Vogue covers) nominate as a speedy deletion. I looked at a couple of uploads, didn't see anything that reached the level of "OMG, must be deleted ASAP", and considered my job of responding to the request done. In particular, there was certainly nothing about the images that constitutes vandalism, just the usual sort of out-of-scope uploads we get all day. The exact reason I gave this report immediate attention at all (in the midst of doing other stuff) is that AN/V is often where we get reports of someone doing massive, ongoing damage that needs to be dealt with immediately. - Jmabel ! talk 18:42, 1 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

138.94.174.213

edit

User: 138.94.174.213 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Vandalism from a Brazilian LTA, see abuse filter log. XReport --Codename Noreste (talk) 03:03, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done I know we don't normally indef-block an IP address, but I did. If anyone wants to shorten it, feel free. - Jmabel ! talk 05:38, 2 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
In this case, it is quite justified. This IP was already blocked for a year, and that wasn't sufficient. Yann (talk) 16:13, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

172.102.80.174

edit

User: 172.102.80.174 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Disruption only FMSky (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

They might actually have thought what they were doing was correct. No one (including you) gave a warning. I have now given one. - Jmabel ! talk

User:Ali khalafialipour

edit

Spam! JayCubby (talk) 02:45, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  •   Done user warned, everything nominated for deletion.
  • Reminder: there is nothing unique to admins in the ability to nominate files for deletion and/or to warn people that their uploads constitute unacceptable self-promotion. - Jmabel ! talk 05:02, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
    Fair enough. I don't trust myself with VFC enough to mass-tag a set of uploads, though there's only one way to tell if I'll actually botch it. Cheers! JayCubby (talk) 05:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

More accounts after Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Greydiomond67200

edit

Reason for reporting: The second user was blocked last December as a result of the CU case above. After the block, I found that they made more accounts with file copyright concerns. Please see the enwiki SPI page for CU information. MathXplore (talk) 15:12, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done All blocked. Yann (talk) 16:11, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Yann: Please block "Cross-Wiki Abuse Blowjob Vändal", too. Pure vandalism account --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:18, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
  DoneAlready done, as I see --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:20, 3 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Gendo Creative Arts

edit

User: Gendo Creative Arts (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: promotional edits, see contribs and userpage. XReport --All the Best -- Chuck Talk 05:07, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done. I deleted speedily some obvious copyvios, but in my opinion the rest does not qualify for speedy deletion. User is warned, userpage deleted, that's currently enough. You can nominate the rest for regular deletion not as copyvios, but due to some kind of out of scope. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

2a00:f41:5804:d3ee:c697:aba8:3f17:4d39

edit

User: 2a00:f41:5804:d3ee:c697:aba8:3f17:4d39 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Restoring talk page vandalism by recently blocked IP User:2A00:F41:5812:33D6:E4A0:287:8208:6D73, might need a different rangeblock. Belbury (talk) 11:36, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Blocked by Achim55. Yann (talk) 16:37, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

BMI lowered

edit

User: BMI lowered (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: User:Roratowiec sock uploading the same attack image (File:Tłuszczyk.jpg) that three or four socks have already been blocked for today. (Same vandalism as the IP report directly above this.) Belbury (talk) 12:47, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Blocked but there's another one at Obese MBi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log now. Belbury (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply
  Done also blocked GPSLeo (talk) 15:10, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

QuantumWikiX97

edit

User: QuantumWikiX97 (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Still uploading AI images with spam links to sanbongdepemo.com in the description and source, after being asked to stop advertising yesterday. No other contributions. Belbury (talk) 16:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Blocked, all files deleted. Already reported to COM:ANB. Yann (talk) 16:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Tłuszcz z brzucha MBi

edit

User: Tłuszcz z brzucha MBi (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: More of today's ongoing block evasion by User:Roratowiec, reposting attack images. Belbury (talk) 21:52, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Blocked by Achim55. Yann (talk) 22:27, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Qostik

edit

User: Qostik (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: A full decade of copyvios, still uploading photos from the web without permission. Last blocked for three months in 2019. I don't think they're going to get it. Belbury (talk) 22:13, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Blocked for a year, all copyvios deleted. Yann (talk) 22:26, 4 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Ferezcopowersystem

edit

User: Ferezcopowersystem (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log
Reason for reporting: Ongoing spam, has been warned extensively Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:35, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

  Done Indeffed, uploads binned. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 5 February 2025 (UTC)Reply